In the past, developmentalists believed that human intelligence is Static, whereas now it is commonly understood that intelligence is malleable.
Human intelligence:
- The capacity to learn from experience, adapt to novel circumstances, comprehend and manage abstract concepts, and apply information to influence one's surroundings are all components of human intelligence.
- Humans are cognitively capable of learning, forming concepts, understanding, applying logic and reason, as well as the capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate. These abilities are all a part of intelligence.
- Humans are often regarded as the most intellectual species on the planet; humans possess large brains that are superior to those of other animals in terms of processing speed and cognitive ability. In actuality, during millions of years of evolution, humans have demonstrated a tremendous growth in brain size and intelligence.
Learn more about human intelligence here brainly.com/question/16543469
#SPJ4
The correct answer is U2
The Nobel Prize is one of the most prestigious awards in the world. Every year, people who have done research of great value for the good of the human being in various areas, such as Chemistry, Physics, Medicine, Literature, Economics and Peace, are chosen and awarded.
Not sure but The Congressional delay in certifying George Washington’s election as president only allowed more time for doubts to fester as he considered the herculean task ahead. He savored his wait as a welcome “reprieve,” he told his former comrade in arms and future Secretary of War Henry Knox, adding that his “movements to the chair of government will be accompanied with feelings not unlike those of a culprit who is going to the place of his execution.
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
I believe the answer is: It would be narrow
Judicial restraint is the view that encourages encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. This would force the judge to interpret the constitution limited to only things that explicitly written in the constitution, without any chance to make adjustment to changing norms or technology.
