Answer: (B) Backward induction
Explanation:
The backward induction is basically used for making the decisions and it is the process of solving the various types of problems by determining the action properly.
In any type of situation, the backward induction basically used the optimal strategy type for making some effective result of the given situation.
According to the given scenario, Elly should use the backward induction process for making the decisions more effectively regarding her shop.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct.
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is <span>worldcom try to structure the transactions to get a “step-up” in the tax bases of mci’s assets because he doesn't have enough influence to do so.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Okay. So it's $10,000 per year, which is $100,000 in 10 years. I'm not so sure how to solve it exactly, but I found a lump sum calculator online. I put the information on that and according to the calculator, today's payment in a lump sum would be $50,894.93. The future value is $100,000 with 10 periods (in this case, years) of the interest rate of 7% once per year. I think that the answer is $50,894.93.
Answer:
Sunk costs.
Explanation:
Sunk costs refers to historical funds spent or incurred that cannot be recovered. Such costs are considered irrelevant during decision making which impacts on the business's future as they present no influence on present or future prospects.
Example
ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, money that has been or will be paid regardless of the decision whether to proceed with the project is sunk costs.
