Answer: D
Explanation: A capital budgeting project is usually evaluated on its own merits. That is, capital budgeting decisions are treated separately from capital structure decisions. In reality, these decisions may be highly interwoven. This interweaving is most apt to result in firms accepting some negative NPV all-equity projects because changing the capital structure adds enough positive leverage tax shield value to create a positive NPV.An optimal capital structure is the objectively best mix of debt, preferred stock, and common stock that maximizes a company’s market value while minimizing its cost of capital.
In theory, debt financing offers the lowest cost of capital due to its tax deductibility. However, too much debt increases the financial risk to shareholders and the return on equity that they require. Thus, companies have to find the optimal point at which the marginal benefit of debt equals the marginal cost. As it can be difficult to pinpoint the optimal structure, managers usually attempt to operate within a range of values. They also have to take into account the signals their financing decisions send to the market.
A company with good prospects will try to raise capital using debt rather than equity, to avoid dilution and sending any negative signals to the market. Announcements made about a company taking debt are typically seen as positive news, which is known as debt signaling. If a company raises too much capital during a given time period, the costs of debt, preferred stock, and common equity will begin to rise, and as this occurs, the marginal cost of capital will also rise.
To gauge how risky a company is, potential equity investors look at the debt/equity ratio. They also compare the amount of leverage other businesses in the same industry are using on the assumption that these companies are operating with an optimal capital structure—to see if the company is employing an unusual amount of debt within its capital structure.
The opportunity cost of shifting from point C to D is 40 tons of oranges.
<h3>What is the formula for calculating opportunity cost?</h3>
Opportunity cost is the help you forego in choosing one duration of action over another. You can determine the opportunity cost of picking one investment option over another by using the following method: Opportunity Cost = Return on Most Profitable Investment Choice - Return on Investment Chosen to Pursue. The law of increasing opportunity cost: As you increase the production of one good, the opportunity expense to produce the more goods will increase.
To learn more about the Opportunity cost visit the link
brainly.com/question/13036997
#SPJ4
Answer: Helena will most likely end up spending some more money on everything else after receiving the voucher.
Explanation:
The budget constraint is used to shows the combinations of two goods which can be afforded by a consumer. A normal good is a good or product that when the income of the person rises,the demand for the product will also increase.
Based on the above information on the question, the correct answer is "Helena will most likely end up spending some more money on everything else after receiving the voucher".
This is because the voucher she was given can be spent only on educational expenses and her budget constraints comprises of educational expenses and everything else which is made up of normal goods. This means she'll still needs to get the normal goods later.
The U.S. imports more than it exports in part to supply the strong consumer demand.
Answer:
the direct labor cost budgeted is $1,500,000
Explanation:
The computation of the direct labor cost budgeted is given below:
The Direct labor budget for September is
= September production × required no of hours × direct labor wage per hour
= 50,000 × 2hour × $15
= $1,500,000
hence, the direct labor cost budgeted is $1,500,000
