It must be original because the jurisdiction do federal rial courts have to be original
The answer is: Group altering
According to kounin, group altering refers to a type of classroom management where the interaction within the class tend to be unpredictable between one student to another. (when he asked the question first, it would most likely make all the students become more focus in anticipation of being suddenly pointed and asked)
<span />
The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
In this case, Andrew was using systematic desensitization, this is a psychological technique of cognitive-behavioral therapy. <span>It consists of exposing oneself to something</span> that causes fear in a systematic way as a means to overcome fear. Andrew faced his fear gradually and so he could overcome it. This technique helps in many different types of phobias.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
Making the assumption that these people were prejudiced or racist is an example of the correspondence bias.
Explanation: On December 1st, 1955, Rosa Parks was commuting back home by bus, when the driver asked her and three other African Americans to stand up from their seats so that white passengers could seat there. While the three other passengers complied with the driver's order, Rosa Parks denied to do so, which ended up with her arrest, and later on with a social movement that decided to boycott the buses in Montgomery during Rosa Parks' trial. Although most of the people decided to leave the first seat behind the driver empty in honor of Rosa Parks, some of them actually seat on it anyways. Assuming that these people were racists is an example of a correspondence bias. A correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's personality based on a unique and specific observed behavior.There are many circumstances and reasons as to why that people sat on the seat that was meant to be empty that would not make them instantly perceived as racist or prejudiced, but assuming that they are based on that one action would be an example of a correspondence bias.
