All categories

2 years ago

Which employee had the highest earned commission? What specifically was their commission amount?

Business

1 answer:

Xelga [282]2 years ago

8 0

Commission simply means a form of variable-pay remuneration for services that are rendered or products sold.

<h3>What is commission?</h3>

Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview will be given. A commission is a payment that an employee makes based on a sale.

For example, when an employee sells a product for $500 and they get a 10% commission on all sales, then the employee will earn $50 on that sale.

Learn more about commissions on:

brainly.com/question/957886

You might be interested in

IBM expects to pay a dividend of $2 next year and expects these dividends to grow at 6% a year. The price of IBM is $90 per sha

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Cost of equity = 8.22%

Explanation:

Cost of equity = Dividend per share /current market value + growth rate of dividend

Cost of equity = 2/90 + 6%

Cost of equity = 0.0222 + 6%

Cost of equity =0.0222 + 0.06

Cost of equity = 0.0822

Cost of equity = 8.22%

7 0

2 years ago

You have just won the state lottery and have two choices for collecting your winnings. You can collect $100,000 today or receive

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

The present value Option 1 = $100,000

The present value Option 2 =$97.368,57‬

Explanation:

The formula to calculate Present Values is equal to:

Present Value = FV / (1+r) ∧n

Let´s calculate Present Value for Option 2:

PV1 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 1= $18,181.82

PV2 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 2= $16,528.92

PV3 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 3= $15,026.29

PV4 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 4= $13,660.26

PV5 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 5= $12,418.42

PV6 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 6= $11,289.47

PV7 = $20,000 / (1+0,10) ∧ 7= $10,263.16

PV1 + PV2 +PV3 +PV4 + PV5 + PV6 + PV7 = $97.368,57‬

3 0

3 years ago

Laurel, Inc., and Hardy Corp. both have 6 percent coupon bonds outstanding, with semiannual interest payments, and both are curr

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

A. If interest rates suddenly rise by 2 percent, what is the percentage change in the price of these bonds?

Laurel, Inc. = -8.11%

Hardy Corp. = -18.91%

B. If interest rates were to suddenly fall by 2 percent instead, what would the percentage change in the price of these bonds be then?

Laurel, Inc. = +8.98%

Hardy Corp. = +25.49%

Explanation:

bonds with 6% semiannual coupons, sold at par $1,000

Laurel, Inc. bond maturity in 5 years

Hardy Corp. bond maturity in 18 years

the current price of a bond is the sum of the present value of its face value and coupons. I will use an annuity table to calculate PV of face value and an ordinary annuity table for the coupons:

Laurel, Inc.

market rate 4% = ($1,000 x 0.8203) + ($30 x 8.9826) = $820.30 + $269.48 = $1,089.78, % change = 89.78/1,000 = 8.98%

market rate 8% = ($1,000 x 0.6756) + ($30 x 8.1109) = $675.60 + $243.33 = $918.93, % change = -81.07/1,000 = -8.11%

Hardy Corp.

market rate 4% = ($1,000 x 0.4902) + ($30 x 25.489) = $490.20 + $764.67 = $1,254.87, % change = 254.87/1,000 = 25.49%

market rate 8% = ($1,000 x 0.2437) + ($30 x 18.908) = $243.70 + $567.24 = $810.94, % change = -189.06/1,000 = -18.91%

3 0

3 years ago

What is the value of a put option at expiry if the stock price is 'S' and the exercise price is 'X'?

Setler [38]

Answer:

A put option is out of the money if the strike price is less than the market price of the underlying security. The holder of an option contract can exercise the option at any time before expiration.

Explanation:

hope this helps if not please let me know

6 0

1 year ago

When a tax is levied on a good, the buyers and sellers of the good share the burden, A. provided the tax is levied on the seller

Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

Here all of these options are wrong , the correct answer is regardless of how the tax is levied the burden of tax would be shared by both the seller and buyer.

Explanation:

Tax can be said as primary source of income for the government. When a tax is levied on the goods , the burden of that would have to be bear by both buyer and seller , irrelevant of how that levied . If the taxes are high then the demand by buyer would be less and seller would receive low price because less people would buy and n the case where taxes are low demand would be high and seller would receive high prices ,in both cases tax would be levied on both seller and buyer and how much it would be depends upon the elasticity of demand and supply. So all the statements given here are false or invalid.

6 0

2 years ago