Graph the line with slope -2 and y intercept-5.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Alona [7]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

If you meant the y-intercept is -5 then the equation is:
y= -2x - 5
If you meant the y-intercept is 5 then the equation is:
y= -2x + 5

Step-by-step explanation:

The first Graph attached corresponds for the first equation.
The second Graph attached corresponds for the second equation.

You might be interested in

Membership in a skiing club is expected to grow by about 8% per month. Currently, there are 530 members in the club. In about ho

Tpy6a [65]

530 x .08 + 42.40

9 months

7 0

3 years ago

The following 5 questions are based on this information: An economist claims that average weekly food expenditure of households

Gnom [1K]

Answer:

>> Null hypothesis; H0: μ1 - μ2 ≥ 0

Null hypothesis; Ha: μ1 - μ2 < 0

>> z = 1.85

>> p-value = 0.03

>> there is evidence sufficient to reject the claim that average weekly food expenditure of households in City 1 is more than that of households in City 2.

The economist claim is not supported by data.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given;

Sample mean of city 1; x1¯ = 164

Sample mean of city 2; x2¯ = 159

Sample size of city 1; n1 = 35

Sample size of city 2; n2 = 30

Standard deviation of city 1; σ1 = 12.5

Standard deviation of city 2; σ2 = 9.25

Let's define the hypotheses;

Null hypothesis; H0: μ1 - μ2 ≥ 0

Null hypothesis; Ha: μ1 - μ2 < 0

Test statistic which is the z-score Formula between 2 mean is;

z = ((x1¯ - x2¯) - 0)/√((σ1)²/n1) + ((σ2)²/n2))

z = (164 - 159 - 0)/√((12.5²/35) + (9.25²/30))

z = 5/2.705

z = 1.85

From online p-value from z-score calculator attached, using z = 1.85, one tailed, significance value of 0.05, we have;

p-value = 0.03

The p-value is less than the significance value, and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence sufficient to reject the claim that average weekly food expenditure of households in City 1 is more than that of households in City 2.