The theoretical differences between Kohlberg and Haid is that Kohlberg posited moral judgments as stages of moral development and Haidt posited moral judgments as innate notions.
<h3>Who was Lawrence Kohlberg?</h3>
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) was an American psychologist noted for his theoretical development related to the developmental theory of moral judgment.
In his theory he developed several concepts related to the stages of moral judgment such as:
- Preconventional: It refers to the moral judgment related to actions that represent rewards or punishments following an authority or one's own convenience.
- Moral dilemmas: It refers to the moral judgment that is related to the choice of an option according to the consequences.
- Conventional: Refers to the moral judgment that is related to actions that are in harmony with the norms and laws of the external social system.
- Universal ethical principles: Refers to the personal moral judgment of each person who acts according to his way of thinking.
<h3>Who is Jonathan Haidt?</h3>
Jonathan Haidt (1963) is an American social psychologist who stands out for his extensive studies in the field of morals and ethics.
His theory of ethics posits that there are six innate moral foundations, upon which cultures develop their various moralities. These six fundamentals are:
- Care/damage
- Justice/deception
- Freedom/oppression
- Loyalty/betrayal
- Authority/subversion
- Holiness/degradation.
The main objective of this theory is to explain intercultural differences regarding morality.
<h3>What is the difference between Kohlberg and Haidt?</h3>
The difference in the theory of these two psychologists is that Kohlberg posits moral judgments as stages of moral development, while Haidt posits moral judgments as innate notions that develop according to the environment.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text is missing. However I can answer it based on my prior knowledge.
Learn more about morality in: brainly.com/question/4309262
