1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
1 year ago
7

which statement best describes the purpose of title ix legislation passed in 1972? a:to allow women free access to healthcare wh

ile pregnant b:to demand for equal work for males and females c:to promote more funding for females to study math and sciences at the secondary level d:to prohibit discrimination against females in school sponsored activities and promote fair funding for female athletes?​
History
1 answer:
steposvetlana [31]1 year ago
3 0

It should be noted that the impact of Title IX on women's opportunities since it was put into law in 1972 are:

  • to prohibit discrimination against females in school sponsored activities
  • promote fair funding for female athletes.

This Title IX  was the one that actually give room for the participation of in athletics by women as well as other activities.

<h3>What is impact of Title IX on women?</h3>

This Title IX serves as a libration which allows women to utilize their right in the society.

Learn more about Title IX  at:

brainly.com/question/14569343

You might be interested in
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
Why was the transit of venus historically so important to astronomers?
padilas [110]
Helped determine our distance from the sun and might have an atmosphere, like Earth.
8 0
3 years ago
Who is the German writer of The Sorrows of Young Werther?
Minchanka [31]
The German writer of The Sorrows of Young Werther was C.  <span>Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, first published in 1774.</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The picture above shows an example of the destruction caused by the Galveston
larisa86 [58]
That guy above me is correct
4 0
3 years ago
A Hindu living in an early Indian society is born into the Brahmin caste. Which of these occupations is he most likely to pursue
77julia77 [94]
D. Performing Hindu rituals at a temple because its the probable answer because he is a hindu
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the Homeland Security Agency? A. It was created as an umbrella agency to help coordinate communications
    13·1 answer
  • Not everyone in Texas and the South supported the Confederacy and the Civil War. Who in the South showed opposition to the Confe
    12·1 answer
  • Each of the following was a well-known Egyptian pharaoh except __________. A. Imhotep B. Ramses II C. Hatshepsut D. Tutankhamen
    12·2 answers
  • What is medicare and medicade and why is it important
    10·1 answer
  • What ultimately led to burnside losing the battle of fredericksburg
    15·2 answers
  • Please answer these correctly!
    13·1 answer
  • Can there be true equality amongst cultures?​
    8·1 answer
  • Who was John C. Calhoun and what was his significance?
    5·1 answer
  • Solve each equation 6(v+8)=84​
    7·2 answers
  • Explain why the four Greensboro students were not allowed to eat at the lunch counter.​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!