Answer:
In the statements prior to the given statement, the author makes their opinion clear. The introductory sentence states, "How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction." Off of this statement alone, it is evident that the author strongly questions the morality and ethicalness of dropping a nuclear bomb. It goes on to state "This is not war: . . . this is pure nihilism."
Thus when the author states "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?" they strongly believe that dropping a nuclear bomb is immoral and unethical, they question the meaning of being human if "the very foundations or morality are overthrown" by dropping a nuclear bomb.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
The loyalty to the city-states was greater than the loyalty to any larger conception of Greece. As a result, city-states would only fight or mobilize in cases where the individual city-state was jeopardized, not out of solidarity with other city-states.
Explanation:
This year marks the centennial of the Spanish-American War, which was fought between May and August 1898. For many reasons, this short war was a turning point in the history of the United States.
IT AFFECTED THEM BY THE WARS WE HAVE FOUGHT WITH THEM
