Answer:
.75 would be your answer to your question!
I hope this really answered your question and i'm really happy to help!
Step-by-step explanation:
So you would take the $9.50 + .75 and you will get the answer $10.25
Equation of a circle is:
<span>(x−h<span>)2</span>+(y−k<span>)2</span>=<span>r2</span></span>
h is the x-coordinate of the center and k is the y-coordinate of the center. Even though the formula has minus signs, those are positive numbers. If there were plus signs in there, the numbers h and k would actually be negative. Now since you're centered at the origin, that means h and k are 0, so you'd just have this:
<span><span>x2</span>+<span>y2</span>=<span>r2</span></span><span>
Now since your radius is 7, just square it and replace r^2 woth that value :)</span>
Answer:
Option 1 - Using the Subtraction Property of Equality, 2 is subtracted from both sides of the equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Process
Step 1: 4x + 2 = 10
Step 2: 4x = 8
To find : Which justification describes the process?
Solution :
From step 1 to step 2, we subtract 2 both sides
Step 1: 4x + 2 = 10
Subtracting 2 both side,
⇒ 4x + 2-2 = 10-2
Step 2: 4x = 8
So, The best justification is 'Using the Subtraction Property of Equality, 2 is subtracted from both sides of the equation'.
Therefore, Option 1 is correct.
Answer:
Social Darwinism provided an ideological justification for the social inequalities that capitalism had brought with it: these would result from the hereditary inferiority of the poor and the hereditary excellence of the richer classes, which are best enjoyed under a laissez-faire system. Applied to peoples and races, it became a justification for racism and imperialism.
As can be seen, social Darwinism is a retrograde political and philosophical stance, which considered different ethnic or national groups as different in terms of capacity or development possibilities. Therefore, since this position has been regarded as false, social Darwinism has no justification in our time.
Answer:
it is A i could be wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
