All categories

2 years ago

#14

Mathematics

1 answer:

Oksanka [162]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Because BC=AD=8, segment BC ≅ Segment AD. Because these are horizontal line segments, their slopes are 0 and they are parallel.

Segment BC and AD are opposite sides that are both congruent and parallel. So ABCD is a parallelogram by the opposite sides congruent theorem.

Step-by-step explanation:

So if you count the boxes of segment BC you will get 8, same for if you count the boxes that make up segment AD. If they are the same distance they are congruent. You can see how BC and AD are both horizontal lines. To find the slope you need to do the slope formula for BC and AD, which is y2-y1/x2-x1 in our case BC= 4-4/12-4 which equals 0/8. If you do the same formula for AD, you will get 0/8 making them congruent and the slope 0. If the opposite sides are congruent and parallel it has to be a parallelogram by the opposites and congruent theorem.

You might be interested in

Find the selling price of a 270% bicycle with a 24% markup

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

hm I say C yess

Step-by-step explanation:

yas yw ;) heh

5 0

3 years ago

Permutations of the word "Congratulations"

Mice21 [21]

Answer:

There are 15 letters, but if the two A's must always be together, that's the same as if they're just one letter, so our "base count" is 14! ; note that this way of counting means that we also don't need to worry about compensating for "double counting" identical permutations due to transposition of those A's, because we don't "count" both transpositions. However, that counting does "double count" equivalent permutations due to having two O's, two N's, and two T's, so we do need to compensate for that. Therefore the final answer is 14!/(23)=10,897,286,400

5 0

3 years ago

Solve the equation for x.

valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

Solve for

by simplifying both sides of the equation, then isolating the variable.

Exact Form:

5 /4

Decimal Form:

1.25

Mixed Number Form:

1 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

THE ANSWER IS C

4 0

3 years ago

Calculate had a net income of 5 million dollars in 2010, while a small competing company, Computate, had a

Julli [10]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)

b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.

c) Year 13; no

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.

b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.

The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.

c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.

6 0

3 years ago

The nine cats in a pet store were weighed. Their weights (in pounds) are given below.

stepladder [879]

Range is 6 and the mode is 8

6 0

3 years ago