The answer is (4, 3)! :)
Explanation:
3 < 2(4) - 5
3 < 8 - 5
3 < 3 IS NOT TRUE
(Could I get brainliest too?)
Answer:
There's no direct variation
Step-by-step explanation:
Required
Determine if there's a direct variation between the number and its position
I'll start by giving an illustration of how the triangle is represented using stars (*)
*
**
***
****
*****
Represent the line number with y and it's position with x
On line 1:
y = 1, x = 1
On line 2:
y = 2, x = 3
On line 3:
y = 3, x = 6
On line 4:
y = 4, x = 10
On line 5:
y = 5, x = 15
Note that, x is gotten by calculating the accumulated number of stars while y is the line number.
Direct variation is represented by
y = kx
Or
kx = y
Where k is the constant of variation
For line 1:
Substitute 1 for y and 1 for x
k * 1 = 1
k = 1
For line 2:
Substitute 2 for y and 3 for x
k * 3 = 2
Divide through by 3
k = ⅔
Note that the values of k in both computations differ.
This implies that there's no direct variation and there's no need to check further.
5-3+10+137 10 and 137 are your numbers hope this helped
Type o ( ii) = 6 . 25
Type A ( l^A l ^A or l ^A i ) = 18 . 75
Type B ( l ^b l^b or l ^ bi ) = 18.75
Type AB ( l ^ A l^ B) = 56.25
Step-by-step explanation:
A 55ttty65t78with city council spokeswoman said that in August
