Answer:
The null hypothesis is
.
The alternative hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose that a recent article stated that the mean time spent in jail by a first-time convicted burglar is 2.5 years.
At the null hypothesis, we test if the mean is of 2.5 years, that is:

A study was then done to see if the mean time has increased in the new century.
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the mean has increased, that is, if it is above 2.5 years. So

Answer:
I believe this equation is Linear
Explanation:
Divide the negative 16 by 2= -8
Then square -8
So the missing constant is 64
The perfect square would be (x-8)^2
Step-by-step explanation:
2m+m=10+8
3m=18 /3
M=6