Answer:
True
Explanation:
The reason is that the Internation Financial Reporting Framework says that though there are choices the company must opt to the depreciation method that brings fairness to the financial statement, which means that the method used calculates the depreciation for the year that actually represents the decrease in the value of the assets in market value. So if the current method brings the fairness to the Financial statements, Lucky can use them and if those don't bring fairness to the financial statements then its better to use alternative which will bring the fairness to financial statements.
Answer:
I believe that this answer is true
Explanation:
Answer:
The corrects answers for this would be A and C.
Explanation:
As you can see, for both a and c, those are the only two answers that have a negative outcome, hence the negative externality.
I think the answer is convergent plate boundaries, but I am not positive. hope this helps :)
Answer:
At one time, the centrally planned economy of China encouraged farmers to produce iron in their backyards, rather than have factories make iron. This proved unsuccessful, since most of the farmers' iron was of poor quality. Why do you think this approach was unsuccessful? How could this experiment become a success in a free market economy?
The reason why the approach whereby farmers make iron in their backyard could not work out is as a result of not being inclined in that market as they are only skilled in agriculture, also they do not understand the rhetorics of the business.
The experiment would be a success in a free market as anyone is allowed to sell such product, this gives room for competition and helps to price reduction which is good for the consumers, also it would help in improvement of such product's quality because of competition involved
Explanation: