Answer:
microeconomics: The study of the behavior of individual households and firms in making decisions on the allocation of limited resources. Macroeconomics: The study of the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole, rather than individual markets.
Explanation:
Answer:
Actual usage of material exceeds the standard material allowed for output.
Explanation:
<em>Material quantity variance occurs when the actual quantity used to achieved a given level of output is greater or less than the standard material allowed.</em>
<em>It is determined by the difference between the actual and standard quantity of material for the actual level of output multiplied by the the standard price</em>
An unfavorable materials quantity occurs when the actual quantity used to achieved a given level of output is greater than the standard material allowed.
<em>It is might be an indication of wastage in the usage of materials or inefficiencies.</em>
Answer:
The main challenge associated with payments across international borders is the challenge of currency rates. Because currencies vary across countries, sometimes a payment can be either hugely benefitial or hugely detrimental for a company, depending on how expensive or cheap its domestic currency is compared to the foreign currency.
Another challenge is related to international legislation, banking systems, red tape, and so on. Banking laws in some countries are more favorable to firms than in others, for example, by charging less financial expenses or comissions.
Answer:
In economics, the marginal cost of production is the change in total production cost that comes from making or producing one additional unit. To calculate marginal cost, divide the change in production costs by the change in quantity.
Answer:
B. Mary will win the case as she had already won at the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Explanation:
When 8 judges review Mary's case and is split 4-4 she will win the case as she has won it in the lower court. However the case will not set a precedent for future cases.
This is a rare occurrence as there are usually 9 justices presiding in supreme court reviews.
