Answer:
dissociative amnesia
Explanation:
dissociative amnesia is a dissociative disorder . it can be term as the lack of the ability to remember/recur essential information mostly personal information that should not be easily forgotten ordinarily like that. I it main causative reason is usually as a result of trauma or stress. in this type of disorder it can easily be called mental sickness or break done, memory loss, identity disruption e.t.c it is selective in nature that is importance event, information e.t.c. are forgotten by individual which ordinarily shouldn't be forgotten.
Answer:
The answer is Unlimited.
Explanation:
The storage capacity of long-term memory is <u>Unlimited. </u>
Answer: “The fool walked up and demanded to be heard”
Reasoning: The other options would be deemed as personal opinions, not a defined action. The fool walking would be a fact
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
