They allow archaeologist to picture what life could of been like
Answer:
Cuneiform was used as a form of record-keeping and it was picked up by the speakers of different languages. This helped to perpetuate it across different cultures. Today it is largely preserved on stone tablets whereas other exemplars of early languages were kept on more perishable materials like leather or papyrus.
Explanation:
Cuneiform was a language that many societies in the Ancient Near East had in common. The cuneiform style was so dominant that scholars have said that it is the script for the first half of recorded history. Even to this day, cuneiform tablets survive in great abundance. The cuneiform script was not in itself a language. Scribes from different cultures could decipher and use it to convey information in a number of languages and not just ancient Sumerian. Among them is the Semitic language Akkadian which was the lingua franca of the Assyrian Empire and for the Babylonians. The Rosetta Stone equivalent for cuneiform is Bisitun Pass in Iran. There there are inscriptions recorded in Persian, Akkadian, and an Iranian language known as Elamite. This allowed researchers to decipher repetitive words across the different languages like “Darius” and “king” and so they could eventually piece together the information that cuneiform conveyed.
Dressing most of the times shows people the kind of person you are so basically it affects your self image in a way.
Answer:
Free Will - Determinism Debate
Explanation:
In the Free Will - Determinism Debate, two opposing views about human psychology clash.
Those who believe in free will think that humans have agency to act in the ways they want, and to freely decide what course of action to take according to external conditions. (even if they cannot fully control those external conditions).
Those who believe in determinism think that free will does not exist because external conditions, or conditions outside one's control, always determine (hence the term determinism) the course of action of life path that a person takes.
The ethical implications of making a moral judgment on past actions by researchers are as follows :
Historical actions, events, and agents can elicit admiration, wonder, horror, or sympathy. It has the potential to stimulate moral judgement at times. As a result, despite the human tendency to make moral judgments about the past, some people may experience uneasiness when making retrospective moral judgments.
As a result, people may be hesitant to assign moral blame to people from the past. Reluctance to assign blame is sometimes accompanied by a willingness to judge actions as morally wrong and then conclude that certain rights of the individuals involved in the actions were violated.
Learn more about ethical implications of making a moral judgment here
brainly.com/question/14487543
#SPJ4