(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
Answer: The correct answers are "decrease" and "decrease".
Explanation: Some policymakers have argued that products like cigarettes, alcohol, and sweetened soda generate negative externalities in consumption. All else equal, if the government decided to impose a tax on soda, the equilibrium quantity of soda would <u>decrease</u> and the equilibrium price of soda would <u>decrease.</u>
Answer:
the expected return on the portfolio is 14.77%
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return on the portfolio is shown below:
The expected return is
= ($1,600 ÷ $4,300) × 11% + ($2,700 ÷ $4,300) × 17%
= 14.767 %
= 14.77%
The $4,300 comes from
= $1,600 + $2,700
= $4,300
hence, the expected return on the portfolio is 14.77%
The same is considered
Answer:
Inelastic
Explanation:
In the given question,the cost to produce the toothpaste has increased, which led to the increase in the price of the toothpaste significantly. But there is no change in the demand of the toothpaste.
Hence, this product is inelastic.
In the inelastic demand, the demand of the product does not change with any variation in the price of the product.
Answer:
This type of trade is called Arbitrage trading.
Explanation:
Arbitrage trading a simultaneously selling and buying of financial instruments or entering into various transactions at the same time in at least two different market to make money through the exploitation of price differences.
In this case, because there is price differences between the borrowing market in Japan and deposit market in Australia, the trader can earn profit by borrowing in Japan in yen, converting the amount into AUD and deposit it in Australia to earn 4% per annum profit.
Such scenario exists as a result of market inefficiency. As more and more trader does the same trading, borrowing cost in Japan will be higher ( due to higher demand) and deposit cost in Australia will be lower ( due to higher supply). In the end, market will be efficient and such trading will not lead to any profit gained from price differences.
