I believe the answer is: <span>person-situation controversy
</span><span>person-situation controversy refers to a debate in the field of psychology which argue whether a person or the situation play a more crucial factor in determining a person's behavior.
</span>
Experts who support the 'person' side in this controversy believed that people with bad personality traits would always do bad behaviors regardless the situation they're in.
Experts who support the 'situation' side in this controversy believed that bad behaviors only occurs because the people are facing bad situations in their life.
The correct answer is displacement.
According to Dollard et al.'s frustration-aggression hypothesis, aggression is caused by and followed by feelings of frustration or anger. In terms of this hypothesis, displacement refers to the phenomenon where frustration causes individuals to direct their aggression on to something or someone who has nothing to do with the actual cause or source of the person's frustration.
It's definitely c of am rong sorry
This suggestion reflects a concern with causal mechanisms. The Causal mechanism is the procedures or passageways over which an outcome is taken into being. There are two broad types of theories of causation which is the Humean theory which is causation as regularities and the causal-realist theory which is causation as a causal mechanism. The Humean theory embraces that causation is completely established by facts about empirical regularities among noticeable variables in which there is no fundamental causal nature, causal power or causal necessity while the causal-realist takes concepts of causal mechanisms and causal powers as essential, and holds that the undertaking of scientific research is to attain at empirically defensible theories and hypotheses about those causal mechanisms.
