I’m not sure, but here is an idea. Mexico finished, but they could lack in people & weapons. Mexico had a disadvantage.
The third part of James k. Polk's war plan was to "1.) to capture Mexico city". This fell outside Polk's usually craving for manifest destiny, which up until then have only been an east-to-west route.
Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
