Answer:
Explanation:
std rate $9.00
actual rate $8.50
standard hours 5,200
Total variance: 390 Favorable
Rate variance:
Efficiency
Total:
rate + efficiency
We plug our know values and solve:
0.5actual hours + 46,800 - 9actual hours = 390
46,800 - 390 = 8.5 actual hours
46,410/8.5 = actual hours = 5,460
now we calculate each variance:
rate: 2,730
efficiency (2,340)
Answer:
B. Workers prefer companies that minimize operating costs.
C. The owners of stock are society.
D. Successful companies attract more talent.
Explanation:
The intrinsic stock value does not need to reflect the market value of the company stock. However, the intrinsic stock reflects the company's lucrative aspect, something more intuitive that describes the company's operating. Therefore, a high intrinsic stock value reflects a company with great reputation.
A company with high intrinsic stock will surely attract more talent, as the talent pool is motivated by working in a reputable, efficient company. This kind of company is surely cost-effective in terms of operation too.
Answer:$2,125 unfavorable
Explanation:
Given
Standard costs 9,000 hours at $5.50
Actual costs 8,500 hours at $5.75
we have two formulas to calculate for direct labor rate variance is:
1ST ----Direct Labor rate variance = (Actual Rate- Standard Rate ) x Actual hour
=( $5.75 -$5.50) x 8,500 = $2,125 unfavorable
2ND----Direct Labor Rate Variance=Actual Direct Labor Cost Incurred - Standard Direct Labor Cost Based on Actual Hours
=Actual Hours x Actual Rate -Actual Hours x Standard Rate
= ($5.75 x 8,500 hours)-($5.50 x 8,500 hours)
$48,875 - $46,750 = $2,125 unfavorable
when the actual rate is higher than the standard rate, the Direct Labor Rate Variance is unfavorable and if the actual rate is lower than standard rate, the variance is favorable.
Answer: b. Dow Jones Industrial Average
Explanation: The Dow Jones Industrial Average index futures has a multiplier of $10 times the index value which is used to calculate contract settlements and helps determine the dollar value of each point of price movement. For example, Dow multiplier is 10, meaning each Dow point is worth $10 per contract.
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.
