Answer:
1. 3 years and 9 months
2. $16,439,325
3. 20.33 %
Explanation:
The Summary of the Cash Flows for this project will be as follows :
Year 0 - $7,125,000
Year 1 $1,875,000
Year 2 $1,875,000
Year 3 $1,875,000
Year 4 $1,875,000
Year 5 $1,875,000
Year 6 $1,875,000
Year 7 $1,875,000
Year 8 $1,875,000
Payback Period
$7,125,000 = Year 1 ($1,875,000) + Year 1 ($1,875,000) + Year 1 ($1,875,000) + $1,500,000 / $1,875,000
= 3 years and 9 months
Net Present Value (NPV)
Calculation using a financial calculator :
- $7,125,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
I/YR 12%
Shift NPV $16,439,325
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Calculation using a financial calculator :
- $7,125,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
$1,875,000 CFj
Shift IRR 20.33 %
Answer: $66.25
Explanation:
What should the per unit selling price be to make a 25% profit this year?
First, we'll calculate the total cost which will be:
= $100,000 + $5000(33)
= $100,000 + $165,000
= $265000
%profit = 100(revenue - cost)/ cost
25% = 100(revenue - 265000)/265000
Therefore, revenue will be:
265000(1 + 25%) = 331250
265000(1.25) = 331250
Revenue = $331250
Selling price per unit will be:
= $331250/5000
= $66.25/unit
The measure used to report price changes at the wholesale level is the <u>"Producer Price Index (PPI)".</u>
The producer price index (PPI) is a group of indexes that estimates the normal change in offering costs gotten by household makers of merchandise and enterprises after some time. The PPI estimates value changes from the point of view of the seller and varies from the buyer value record (CPI), which estimates value changes from the buyer's viewpoint. The PPI thinks about three regions of generation: industry-based, product based and item based last interest transitional interest. It was known as the discount value file, or WPI, until 1978.
Answer: a.)maximizes the minimum return.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. auditors and financial statement users.
Explanation:
This is because, the auditors and the financial statement users tends to have different views on what their responsibilities are. Since their views differs, their tend to be a gap which occurs. <em>This gap is called audit expectation gap. This could be minimized through self regulating auditing of the financial statement before the final auditing by auditors.</em>