Answer:
The sample proportion from the sample of 900 is more likely to be close to the true population proportion, p.
Step-by-step explanation:
for the first one
Answer:
So the answer is both
180 and 328 (but it may or may not show you "not possible, if so, then you got it right)
Step-by-step explanation:
SinA/a= SinB/b
1. SinM/780 = Sin164/760
2. 780sin164/760 = 0.2828909704
3. M = sin^-1 (0.2828909704)= 16.4328229 or 16
Check for possibility
180-16= 164
164 + 16= 180 (not possible)
164 + 164= 328 (not possible)
Answer:
the y intercept is 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First, find the <em>rate of</em><em> </em><em>change</em><em> </em>[<em>slope</em>]:
Then plug these coordinates into the Point-Slope Formula Remember, in this formula, all the negative symbols give the OPPOSITE terms of what they really, so be EXTREMELY CAREFUL inserting the coordinates into the formula with their CORRECT SIGNS. It does not matter which ordered pair you choose:
![\displaystyle y - y_1 = m[x - x_1] \\ \\ y - 3 = -1\frac{1}{5}x\:OR\:y + 3 = -1\frac{1}{5}x - 5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20y%20-%20y_1%20%3D%20m%5Bx%20-%20x_1%5D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20y%20-%203%20%3D%20-1%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7Dx%5C%3AOR%5C%3Ay%20%2B%203%20%3D%20-1%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7Dx%20-%205)
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
If you use fractions, the answer you get will always be an exact answer in the form of a fraction. resorting to decimals means that you may run into rounding errors and therefore get only an approximate answer. e.g. the fraction 1/3 cannot be exactly represented by a decimal.fractions can be easier to represent the number rather then using decimals which involve writing out many numbers it does not affect the accuracy of the answer UNLESS you are rounding up and down the numbers
