1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
2 years ago
14

The law of demand states that an increase in the price of a good.

Law
1 answer:
love history [14]2 years ago
8 0

The law of demand states that the increase in the price of a good causes  a resultant decrease in the quantity demanded of the good.

<h3>The law of demand</h3>

According to this law, when the price of a good is increased, ity would reduce the purchasing power of the users of the good. They would be able to buy only less of it.

But a price drop woukd make people to accumulate more of a good.

Read more on the law of demand here:brainly.com/question/24500422

You might be interested in
Voting laws are controlled by the us constitution and...
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

mark if this help

4 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
In the United States, the states that do not utilize preliminary hearings schedule an arraignment date at the ________.
lozanna [386]

Answer:

initial appearance

Explanation:

In the United States, the states that do not utilize preliminary hearings schedule an arraignment date at the initial appearance.

brainliest? :)

7 0
2 years ago
Which best describes “predictive policing”? PLEASE HELP
Gemiola [76]

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

no explination

7 0
3 years ago
Need help with this question, i'll give branliest.
xenn [34]
Well the two patterns are when it turns into a caterpillar, and the second would be when it breaks out of the cocoon to turn into a beautiful butterfly
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Which body parts are most protected by the head restraint in a vehicle? A. Head, hands, and neck B. Neck, spine, and torso C.
    5·1 answer
  • 1. How is power divided and balanced between the people and the government? Between the states and the federal government? Betwe
    9·1 answer
  • One of the mistakes that was made in both the JonBenet Ramsey and Lizzie Borden cases was:
    5·1 answer
  • For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove:
    5·1 answer
  • what happenes if u commit sue a side bc i am about to do it bc ima bought to jump off a cliff right now and i need to know ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • Has the power to issue licenses (driving, hunting, marriage, etc.) This is a state test for Illinois! Pls help!
    6·1 answer
  • List three LE agencies that are under each of the following Federal Departments. Justice Department, Treasury Department and wha
    10·1 answer
  • Who do you want to win the election
    8·2 answers
  • What are the opportunity cost of not providing national security
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following terms refers to an oversimplification fallacy that draws a comparison between two things that are fundame
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!