Answer:
Ethical dilemma
Explanation:
The ethical dilemma is confusion in decision making between two options. This is about unacceptable decisions in ethical perspectives. All people face many ethical problems in everyday life. In this process, most of them come with a straight forward solution.
- To solve the ethical problem:
- To refute the ethical problem.
- To vale the theory to approach.
- To find out the solution.
- Example of ethical dilemma:
- To take the credits of others work
- To offer a bad product to the client so that can benefit from the product
- To utilize the inside knowledge for the benefits of self.
-
1. The western technology aided among other social and political factors in the conquest and control of Asian and African peoples, facilitating the domination against this groups using more advanced weapons. For example, The african forces used weapons such as swords, arrows or old guns while the European colonist used more modern artillery.
2. The National Assembly was a national constituent formed by revolutionary people during the French Revolution in May, 1789. It was known The Third State while the first state was a group of nobles and The Second State was the clergy. The National Assembly spoke against class privilege. For instance, the first and Second state did not pay taxes while the people from the third state were paying it. Consequently, They fought against this inequality and ended up with Feudalism.
3. The first Industrial revolution had on effects on the growth of industries with the use of energy taken from coat for mainly manufacturing textile. The optimization of minerals such as iron for industries was important, too. On the other hand The second Industrial Revolutions had an impact on communication and the spread of information with the invention of the telegraph, the telephone and the invention of the bulb of light patented by Thomas Edison in 1878.
I believe the answer is: are more likely to read your message than academic audiences.
People with business communication background are trained to interpret underlying message that come from various sources or behaviour. Academic audiences on the other hand, tend to only be able to read a certain message after its being constructed for common consumption (such as books)
I'm guessing It could do both but I'm going more with hurting
I believe it is the speaker of the house
then the pro tempore is next i believe