Answer:
Property plant and equipment in non current asset section of Carl Cornfield's balance sheet will be increased.
Cash at bank in current asset section of Carl Cornfield's balance sheet will be decreased.
Explanation:
When the entity makes payment for any vehicle, the following two sections of the balance sheet are changed:
Property plant and equipment in non current asset section is increased.
Cash at bank in current asset section is decreased.
So the following two lines of Carl Cornfield balance sheet will be changed.
Property plant and equipment in non current asset section of Carl Cornfield's balance sheet will be increased.
Cash at bank in current asset section of Carl Cornfield's balance sheet will be decreased.
Answer: Organizing
Explanation:
There are 4 management functions. These functions are:
Planning: In the planning function, employees make business plan, they make reports and forecasts budgets and sales data. Anything within the domain of planning
Leading: Group of employees or Department is lead by Directors or managers or senior managers. These managers get work done through others and lead their team for the overall success of the organization.
Controlling: This includes staffing and training. Employees are subjected to training and development for efficient and effective results. Hiring the right employee for the right position.
Organizing: This is the hierarchy within the organization. Chain of Command that needs to be followed. Over here, Shondra sits in the top of the chain where only top managers report to her. Top managers are in the middle of the chain. Whereas, others below top managers would report to the Human Resources Department.
Answer:
Current money obligation coverage is determined by partitioning net money gave by working exercises by the normal absolute liabilities.
It shows the amount of the organization's absolute liabilities can be secured (paid) with net money from working exercises. As it were, this proportion is one of the proportions of the organization's money related adaptability and steadiness.
In the given instance of Coca-Cola and Pepsi the Current money inclusion proportion of Pepsi is higher (34%) when contrasted with Coca-cola(28%). This implies Pepsi money age from its working activities is better when contrasted with its Average all out liabilities than Coca-Cola. This proportion shows that if Pepsi is producing money from activity to the sum it can pay 34% of its normal all out liabilities where as coca-cola can create 28% money from tasks to take care of normal complete liabilities. In the given money pepsi is better.
Money obligation proportion is a little deviation from Current obligation proportion as from the numerator "income from activities" , profit is subtracted and afterwards the equalization money is separated by the normal absolute liabilities.
For the Coco-cola and Pepsi case , this proportion is better for Coca-cola that implies Coca-cola delivers less profits when contrasted with Pepsi that is the reason the rate inclusion of Pepsi is diminished from 34% to 12%(22% decline) and Coca-cola decrease is just 13%.
Question Completion:
Assume that the required reserve ratio is 10%, and that all currency is deposited into the banking system.
Answer:
The money supply would decrease by $2 billion or less.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Treasury securities bought by the Fed = $200 million
Required reserve ratio = 10%
Money supply = $200 million/0.10 = $2,000 million
b) When the Fed buys Treasury securities worth $200 from the bank, the money supply in the economy will be increased because the action increases the amount of money available to the bank, which the bank can subsequently lend to borrowers. However, since it is expected to lend only part of the money, the increase in the money supply will not amount to $2 billion. The actual money supply will be less than this amount.
Answer:
19.07%
Explanation:
The computation of the total compound return over the 3 years is shown below:
= (1 + investment percentage earned in first year) × (1 + investment percentage earned in second year) × (1 + investment percentage loss in second year)
= (1 + 0.35) × (1 + 0.40) × (1 - 0.37)
= 1.35 × 1.40 × 0.63
= 1.1907
= 19.07%