The following is missing for the question to be complete:
a. consensus
b. exchange
c. symbolic interactionist
d. structural functionalist
Answer: Exchange
Explanation: This theoretical perspective known as social exchange is about joint decisions that will produce certain positive outcomes in terms of the benefits that are maximised in that case. In this way, they make the most profits that have a long-term effect on the family or the community. In doing so, joint decisions are made as a result of negotiations with the consent of all those who agree and decide on the basis of assessing what is best for the community, i.e the family. Such an exchange agreement brings stability, includes all possible alternatives under consideration, and decides on the one solution that will benefit. In other words, as is the case here, the spouses agree on what is best for the family in terms of who will work, so that the result would be the best possible for all.
Answer:
Who brought the first human civilization?
Early civilizations arose first in Lower Mesopotamia (3000 BCE), followed by Egyptian civilization along the Nile River (3000 BCE), the Harappan civilization in the Indus River Valley (in present-day India and Pakistan; 2500 BCE), and Chinese civilization along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers (2200 BCE).
Answer:
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Explanation:
This disorder usually develops at a young age. The symptoms include lack of eye contact and ablivion to the outside world. They have difficulties in social activities and don't make friends easily.
Most free enterprise systems consist of four components: households, businesses, markets and governments. In a free enterprise system, households — not the government — own most of the country's economic resources and decide how to use them. Businesses organize economic resources to create a good or service.
Answer:
No benefit to bailee clause
Explanation:
The no benefit to bailee clause is a type of policy that prevent a person in possession of another person property from benefiting from the insurance the owner has on the property with the insurance company. Which was the reason the owner of the repair shop paid nothing to the owner of the TV because the property was not in the possession of the owner at that particular time and the owner of the repair shop does not own the TV so he can't benefit from any insurance because he is not the policy holder even though the TV was in his custody .
