Question

Claire is severely injured in a car accident. The local hospital cannot treat Claire’s injuries. In order to survive, Claire must be flown via Helicopter to a hospital in a bordering state. Prior to boarding the helicopter, Claire signs a contract obligating her to pay for the helicopter flight and all of its expenses. Claire lives and fully recovers. However, she is being sued by the helicopter company in the amount of $50,000 for the helicopter transportation and its accompanying expenses. What is argument Claire could make in order to rescind the agreement? Does it matter that the helicopter company performed its obligation under the contract?

Answer 1

Does it matter that the helicopter company performed its obligation under the contract?

• Yes, it does matter because they had a legally binding agreement.

What is a Contractual Agreement?

This refers to the legally binding document which two parties attest their signature to about an agreement for a particular thing with the terms clearly stated.

With this in mind, we can see that Claire who was involved in a car accident needs to go to a hospital in another state for better treatment for her injuries and she signs a contractual agreement that she would pay for the helicopter expenses.

In light of this, the argument which Claire can make to rescind the agreement is that her life was in danger and she needed the services of the helicopter company which had her Universal Right to Life.

Read more about contractual agreements here:
brainly.com/question/984979