How did the Bible disprove the attacks by its enemies? Use complete sentences.

History

1 answer:

Finger [1]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

As long as the enemies of The Bible accept the truth of the Bible, it is relatively easy to turn back attacks on the Bible simply by quoting chapter and verse to prove the Bible correct. Some critics, although not necessarily enemies of the Bible, describe this as circular reasoning, because it relies on the Bible to be correct, in order to prove it to be correct. One response to this is to take biblical passages that are confirmed by non-biblical sources, and use this evidence to prove the entire Bible correct and wholly inerrant. Unfortunately, some critics persist and say that no one ever claimed the Bible is never historically correct, just that it is not always so and furthermore that there is no evidence that it is spiritually correct.

Although we can never actually prove the Bible to be spiritually correct, we can seek to divert these attacks by pointing to prophecies in the Bible. If prophecies can be shown to be true, then the Bible must have been inspired by God. The rub is that believers accept the prophecies to be true, but time and again sceptics point to reasons to doubt the very fact of those prophecies.

In the end, we can use the Bible and faith to disprove biblical criticism in our own minds, but we can never really disprove these attacks in the minds of a well-informed critic.

Explanation:

hope this helps!!

You might be interested in

What was one of Hideki Tojo's biggest wartime victories and his country’s biggest

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

WWII

Explanation:

Hideki Tojo held various positions in the Japanese military, but is best known for his actions as Prime Minister of Japan during World War II. He believed firmly in a strong role for Japan in world affairs, demonstrated by his authorization of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

<em>Hope it helps answer the question!</em>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

_____ serve as brief summaries of large amounts of information about what kinds of policies a candidate is likely to put forward

Ket [755]

Answer:

Manifestos

Explanation:

Manifestos are the documents that disclose the information that a candidate, or more often the political party that the candidate belongs to, will present as policy should they be elected. They typically include economical evaluation of the policy and arguments debating its merits. More often than not, they also contain arguments as to why the <em>opposing </em>candidates policies are unwise. They are typically complied and released in preparation for a widespread election, such as a General Election in the UK or a Presidential Election in the USA. These are then (Theoretically) used as on strand of information on which to vote for a candidate.

6 0

3 years ago

Which of these powers is considered an implied power?

sdas [7]

Answer:

raising taxes

..............................

4 0

3 years ago

Who does churchill compare stalin to in recent history

olga nikolaevna [1]

The Russian Resolution

8 0

3 years ago

Which nations are on the security council and why were they chosen as members?

Oksanka [162]

There are five permanent and ten temporary members of the UN Security Council. The states sitting on the security council as permanent members are USA, UK, France, Russia and China, all of which retain the right to veto any action before the Security Council. The remaining ten members of the Security Council rotate between other UN member states. This setup is largely a function of the geopolitics in the immediate period following the end of WWII: the five permanent members were the most powerful states and were on the victorious side of the War.

3 0

4 years ago