Answer: people tend to take more risks if they do not have to bear the costs of their behavior
Explanation:
Moral hazard is a form of reckless behavior by an individual who doesn't directly bear the cost of the reckless behavior.
Moral hazard takes several forms like the examples of : polluting waters with chemicals, throwing refuse into drainage, mismanagement of public amenities.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question provides no context or references, we can say that if the top-level management team has accepted your recommendation their effectiveness can be evaluated three months after implementation in the following way.
The recommendation needs to establish some goals that have to be accomplished in the short, medium, and long-range. After the first three months, you establish your exéctations and you should have included your KPIs or Key Performance Indicators in order to do the proper evaluation and knowing if the recommendations were valid or attainable. Lack of goals or KPIs to evaluate the recommendation would end up complicating the evaluation process.
Answer:
B) making warranties easier to understand.
Explanation:
The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act of 1975 governs consumer product warranties. Manufacturers are not required to offer product warranties, but when they do, they are required to provide clear and detailed information about warranty coverage. This law applies only to products, it doesn't apply to services.
Answer:
II only. A high utilization factor will result in a system that performs poorly is TRUE for a single-server queueing system. As it states that when designing a single-server queueing system, beware that giving a relatively high utilization factor (workload) to the server provides surprisingly poor measures of performance for the system.
True that queueing models enable finding an appropriate balance between the cost of service and the amount of waiting.
Explanation: RATE BRAINLIEST PLEASE
