1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flauer [41]
2 years ago
12

How was the Hands-off Doctrine rationalized by the U.S. government?

Law
1 answer:
Setler [38]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

b

Explanation:

because is ready tu rule

You might be interested in
Why should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to become the next Associate Supreme Court Justice? Pleaseeee helpppp!
vlabodo [156]
It keeps saying incorrect answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As an entrepreneur, you’ll face lots of tough and sometimes ethical decisions. In the situation described below, what do you thi
Kay [80]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:idk

6 0
3 years ago
5 poin
maks197457 [2]
False, a wedding is not a priest’s greatest privilege
6 0
3 years ago
Nation A is neighbors with Nation B. When an international crime lord who operates in both countries is captured by Nation A, it
NeX [460]

Answer:

<h3>Act of State Doctrine.</h3>

Explanation:

According to the U.S Constitution, the Act of State Doctrine is a principle that respects the sovereignty of an independent state. It declares that sovereign states should  respect the independence and integrity of other independent sovereign states.

The doctrine implies that domestic decisions of sovereign states should not be questioned by other independent states. Domestic decisions of another independent state should be respected by other independent states.

Here, since Nation A has apprehended the culprit in its country, it has the full right to decide what punishment and verdict should be given to the culprit.  Through the Act of State Doctrine, it gains full immunity to handle the culprit on its own discretion. Nation B has no right to make any claims or alter the decision of Nation A.

3 0
3 years ago
Who handles minor disputes between parties that usually represent themselves without lawyers.
Nata [24]
Guardian will be able to handle minor disputes between parties
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I was lead to believe that Democracy was rule by the majority, that members of parliament were there to represent the wishes of
    11·1 answer
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law.with specific references to the law of contact.discuss
    10·1 answer
  • Men convicted of crimes of passion have ____brain levels
    7·2 answers
  • Why study crime and criminal justice?
    14·1 answer
  • You are working to design a map each area you are designing will take up to 10 hours to make how many hours will it take you to
    15·1 answer
  • What are the differences between long run and short run in economics<br>​
    8·1 answer
  • Help please I am giving 10 points
    15·2 answers
  • Freeeeeeeee poooooooooiiiinnnnntssss
    8·2 answers
  • How do i do this?
    11·1 answer
  • Television shows like Judge Judy and The People’s Court can offer a distorted view of the judicial process, but they do represen
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!