Answer:
a year because it can take up to months or days
It begins to rain!
Hope this helps (:
The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.
Answer: Option 1
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.
The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard. If in the case raised, then the President, only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement
Jake = Forgery
Both = Conspiracy
Explanation:
• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.
Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.
• Jake's crime is forgery
Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.
• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.
A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.
