1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gavmur [86]
3 years ago
13

Hazirah has lent her money amounting to RM30,000 to her classmate, Intan. Intan has promised to pay her debt to Hazirah. Johan,

Intan’s brother dropped by to Hazirah’s house to setlle Intan’s debt. During the meeting, Johan gave Hazirah RM25,000 where he said the amount will settle all of Intan’s debt to Hazirah. Hazirah accepted the money without any hesitation. Few months later, Hazirah claims the remaining balance of debt from Intan. Intan refused to pay as she contended the debt between both of them have been settled by her brother. Required: Advise Intan whether Hazirah can claim the remaining balance of her debt.
(Confine your answers to the law of contract).​
Law
1 answer:
gulaghasi [49]3 years ago
7 0

Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.

<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>

The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.

Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions.  We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer.  Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.

Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000.  And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.

Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.

Learn more  about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487

You might be interested in
Bankruptcy of the principal​
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:The uni trimester ended while leaves still clung to the trees. Betsie found herself missing the crunching sound of the fallen leaves as she travelled home, the audible sound of autumn weather that usually meant it was holiday time.

Elaine greeted her daughter at the door. A candle burned on the fireplace, it resembled a small amount of warmth yet to come.

Arthur had gone to collect wood, Elaine told Betsie. “He’s losing it. I’m over him. I know we had you late and all, and it is harder I guess when you have a child at a late age but it’s not you that worries me. You are fine!”

Elaine plonked her rear down on the floral armchair, it rocked a little then came back to centre – she didn’t flinch when the hot tea soaked her leg.

It reminded Betsie of a time when she watched her mother push material underneath the foot of the sewing needle. The chain roared while Elaine’s fingers pressed the material. Then she watched as her mother’s finger slipped underneath the foot, punctured by the sharp end of the needle which went all the way through her finger. Elaine didn’t flinch, she finished running that edge, then licked her finger between her thin lips before changing the edge around. Betsie had stared at her mother in wonder.

“I don’t not love Arthur but I don’t like him.” Elaine sipped her tea and it spilled over her chin on to her knitted woollen cardigan.

The candle flickered against the wall above the fire.

“Jane told me, you know young Jane, the teacher next door? She told me that she saw Arthur at the car out front and you know what he said to her? He said ‘I thought I saw a blonde girl walking towards me and I’m blind enough that I couldn’t see her until she was on top of me.’ Then he got in his car and drove off! I’ve told him not to drive. But you know.”

“Mum, cars have always been Arthur’s passion.”

Elaine’s eyes flickered.

Arthur appeared at the arched entry to the lounge room. “You’re near the sex candle. Cost me a lot of sex, that candle!”

“Arthur! Your daughter has come home.”

Arthur giggled. “Whoops! How are you dear?”

“Good dad.”

“Come out back and I’ll show you the beast.”

“New car dad?”

“Old car-new engine!”

“Great!”

Arthur and Betsie left Elaine and the candle flickering in the lounge room.

In the shed they examined a beautiful old Willy’s Jeep with a motor cradled in the bonnet, still chained up on the hoist.

“Now darling,” he turned to his daughter. “I know what you’re thinking. Another car! This old cob can’t deserve another car, can he? But with your mum and all, it’s been hard. Her dementia is getting worse and, well, I need some space.”

Arthur’s eyes flickered.

“I do love your mum. It’s just that, sometimes I don’t like her.”

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
5. Why is freedom of expression so sacred in<br> contemporary society?
Paladinen [302]
Its a fundamental human right. It also underpins most other rights and allows them to flourish. The right to speak your mind freely on important issues in society, access information and hold the powers that be to account, plays a vital role in the healthy development process of any society.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Settlement payment from carnell smith and lenox magee v. fifth third bank class action settlement
Igoryamba

In the case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank, regarding the <em><u>class action </u></em><em><u>lawsuit </u></em>settlement reached by the parties involved, we can confirm the settlement payment is that of 5.2 million dollars.

The case of Smith v Fifth Third Bank was a <u>class action </u><u>lawsuit</u>. A class-action suit is one in which the lawsuit is a collection of suits filed by <u>many parties, which are tried as a single case, and the parties in question are represented by </u><u>one member </u><u>or group of </u><u>members</u>.

In the case mentioned the lawsuit resulted in a settlement. This is when the party being sued <u>agrees to a payout in return for the charges being dropped. </u>It is said that the Bank in question created a settlement fund to pay the members involved, which held a total of 5.2 million dollars to be paid to the victims.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/16108643?referrer=searchResults

8 0
2 years ago
The concept of "conduct" in criminal law encompasses
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

conduct that breaks a law where a crinimal penalty

Explanation:

Criminal conduct means conduct that breaks a law where a criminal penalty can apply. Sometimes a certain action (or failure to act) can be both a crime and trigger rights to civil damages or compensation as well.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was u
natima [27]
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.





Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
    9·1 answer
  • What are the ultimate purpose pf imposing criminal sanctions​
    11·1 answer
  • Please describe three acts that are considered “crimes” in California but that you do not consider to be immoral/unethical
    15·1 answer
  • If My home is searched with out a warrant and they find a gun and I get arrested can I sue the police department for illegal sea
    11·2 answers
  • What source of law controls Snowden’s prosecution? Explain your answer.
    15·1 answer
  • Which term is synonymous with natural rights, according to Enlightenment philosophers?
    14·1 answer
  • Parking is not allowed:
    11·2 answers
  • 2. Which partner is often the first to arrive and last to leave the incident site of a disaster?
    11·1 answer
  • Be sure to answer at least one, or both, of the questions below in your response to the prompt. Explain your reasoning so that y
    12·1 answer
  • When reviewing a lower court decision, an appellate court will:1) review the transcripts of the lower court.2) read briefs from
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!