Our actions are not wrong because there is an ethical difference between treating people as a means and treating them merely as a means to achieve some end. This is the concept behind the Kantian ethics also referred to as means to end principle.
This could have a variety of impacts that this situation could have on the local market. Firstly, the introduction of a Chinese company would mean that there would more competition for the American solar power company which would then have to contend with the Chinese company for sales. They would then be in a race to bring the most affordable options to the consumers as well as new advances in the technology or greater service. This would mean that the consumers would benefit greatly from this situation as they would be getting better products and service for an affordable cost.
Also, both companies could have a working arrangement where they act as an oligopoly and dominate the solar power industry in that particular market. Although, more companies brings more competition, when there aren't a multiplicity of competitors, there is always the danger that the few businesses will band together and operate as one entity where they set specific prices, standards of service and technological advances introduced. They would only superficially be competing with each other. In this arrangement, the consumers would endure the same standard as having one entity dominating the market.
Another scenario would be where the American solar power company makes a superior product and as such would promote their products to the market as 'higher end' which would ensure they have a core and stable consumer base.
Answer:
I'm going to guess the federal budget deficit.
Explanation:
Answer:
Symbols.
Explanation:
A symbol is an object or an image that represents something else besides what it is materially. Usually, there is no connection between the object and what it represents but there is a consense among the people that it is that way. It also allows people to go beyond what is known and create linkages between different concepts and experiences.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
B) Affluent Europeans buy sugar from merchants in European cities. Millions of people in Africa are kidnapped by African slave traders and sold to European sugarcane planters in the Caribbean.
Explanation:
A consequence is regarded as 'intentional' if the people involved foreseen the consequences of their action.
In option B, many slave traders observed that many Rich Europeans buy sugar from the merchant when they are in European cities.
Seeing this , They foresee an opportunity to profit from this situation. They know that they if they can provide a form of cheap labors for the Europeans, the Europeans will definitely buy them since it can cut down their operational cost in the plantation.
So, they Kidnap people from different continent and offer them as slaves. The slave traders in this situation intentionally conducted the slaves because of economic prediction that is fully intentional.
