B. Faustus's conflicting attitude toward sin and repentance.
The answer is the speaker .
The speaker implies, the listener infers.
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
