Answer: Christian egalitarianism
Christian egalitarianism (derived from the French word égal, meaning equal or level), also known as biblical equality, is egalitarianism based in Christianity. In theological spheres, egalitarianism generally means equality in authority and responsibilities between genders, in contrast to complementarianism.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Nazi Empire fell when Germany surrendered in May 1945. Adolf Hitler had committed s u i c i d e about a week before Germany surrendered to the Allies.
Explanation:
It took the largest war in human history to bring about the downfall of Nazism. The invasion of Poland in September 1939 was not intended to provoke a major war. In Hitler’s mind, it was another act of expansion, much like the Anschluss with Austria and the Nazi incursion into Czechoslovakia. Hitler believed the British were unwilling to initiate another war and that London would instead seek a second agreement.
Yes he did I d k but I can not remember at all so look it up
Best Answer:<span> </span><span>After Lenin`s death in 1924, Joseph Stalin won a bitter power struggle against Trotsky. Trotsky advocated worldwide revolution, but Stalin`s aim to build socialism in one country appealed to Russian pride. Stalin created a ruthless totalitarian state. He pushed the country into rapid industrialization and forcibly collectivized agriculture at the expense of living standards. His ruthless `Russification ` program resulted in millions of Russians being deported to labor camps. Thousands of Soviet citizens died in his `blood purges of the 1930's.
Trotsky`s policy of permanent revolution led to dismissal from the Politburo by Stalin in 1926 and eventual exile from Russia in 1929. He moved to Mexico in 1937 where he was assassinated in 1940.
The theories of Communism advocated by Trotsky argued for the permanent worldwide revolution of the proletariat</span>
<span>His overall philosophy was; "I'm the President & You're Not. I'm doing what I think is Best for the Country- and you don't have to like it. " ! Johnson didn't "pull any punches", & he had NO PROBLEM strong arming people- to get what he wanted. He could be crude- and almost harsh... But He was ALWAYS surprisingly "fair" & thoughtful...-particularly to those he felt were at a Social Disadvantage, like the Poor. As Presidents go, He did his Job, -& the Country reflects it today. :)</span>