Answer:
I'm not really sure about the way this question was written but if Betty intended to cause harm she did cause Anna's death. She was thinking already of harming.
Explanation:
A person who is admitted as a partner into an existing firm other than a limited partnership or incorporated limited partnership does not by that admission alone become liable for anything done before the person became a partner.
Hope this helps:)
Answer:
The first answer was a false negative, and the suspect was telling the truth.
Explanation:
In this example, we learn that a suspect is questioned about a crime, while he is later asked about his own personal information. When the suspect talks about himself, we observe a particular reaction. We assume that this information is the truth, as we have a way to check it. When the suspect talks about the crime, we observe the same reaction. This points towards the fact that the suspect is telling the truth. Therefore, if the polygraph registers the statement as a lie, we can assume that this is a case of false negative, but that the suspect was actually telling the truth.
Answer:
1.) The invasion of privacy is bad because you can't really do what you want and it makes you feel uncomfortable.
2.) Misuse of important data and/or information is important because like i dont know that's like an opinion question.
Explanation: