<u>Answer:
</u>
If I wanted to improve morale and enhance the colleague relationships at my company, I would fire the level IV coworkers.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to keep the organizational morale high, one should make sure that there are no negative elements within the organization.
- The possibility of the prevalence of negative elements within the organization is more in the lowermost strata of the organization.
- Hence, it is preferable to eliminate such people from the organization so as to not cause the organization any kind of damage.
Observer bias relates mainly to
"Researchers" whereas observer effects stem from
"participants".
Observer bias<span> which otherwise is known as experimenter bias or research bias etc. is an
inclination to observe what a researcher wishes to see. It states that the
researcher has a prior knowledge about the experiment group while observer effect
refers to the act in science when the act of observing will manipulate the experience
being observed.</span>
<span> </span>
Answer:
the branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles
Answer:
Compromising is essential to forming strong relationships with others. Frendships with no compromise are bound to break due to disagreement and argumentation. Compromise also applies to the buisness world because if someone wants everything their way they'll likely become disdained by their coworkers. If worse comes to worst, they might get fired. With compromise however, these issues are solvable and circumventable.
Answer: Repentance
Explanation: Expressed publicly, this act of speech can be seen as an act of weakness or, conversely, as an act of strenght that exalts the image of the issuer, far from reducing it. It would then be a statement that contains three speech acts: the act of recognition of the fault, that of the proposal for reparation and the act of bravery that emerges from the public recongition of the lack of the politician´s regret is considered a discursive strategy of power that allows you to rehabilitate your image. In its strategic elaboration, the politician tries to appear sincere while mitigating or justifying the importance of the fault.
