1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
siniylev [52]
2 years ago
15

Part A: How does Tubman's attitude toward the state of Maryland change over the course of the selection?

History
2 answers:
hichkok12 [17]2 years ago
6 0

Part A: The change in Harriet Tubman's attitude toward the state of Maryland is:<u> a. At first, she thinks</u> of Maryland as her home, but later she feels like a stranger there.

<h3>Who was Harriet Tubman?</h3>

Harriet Tubman was the woman who arranged for the freedom of enslaved African Americans in the 1850s, especially in Maryland, by taking them across to the North.  

Tubman risked her life in the endeavor but savored the freedom that was bestowed on freed persons more than she suffered the pains inflicted on her person. She was proudly known as the Moses of her days.

Part B: The excerpt from the selection that best supports the answer to Part A is <u>a. Along the Eastern Shore</u> of Maryland, in Dorchester County, in Caroline County, the ...

Learn more about Harriet Tubman at brainly.com/question/866076

leva [86]2 years ago
6 0

The change in Harriet Tubman's attitude toward the state of Maryland is that at first, At first, she is eager to get away from Maryland, but later she remembers it fondly.

How did Harriet Tubman change Maryland?

In the year 1850 Harriet  did went to  Baltimore, Maryland, where she was said to have led her sister and two children to freedom.

The journey was known to be the first of all the dangerous roads into Maryland and she was said to have lead about 70 fugitive enslaved people in the path of the Underground Railroad to Canada.

Learn more about Harriet Tubman's attitude from

brainly.com/question/1286210

You might be interested in
What's the cause and effect of Dec 19, 1872, Carnegie Imitates Bessemer Steel?
Dvinal [7]
Cause: it allows steel to be produced without fuel
effect: lowered the cost of production steel
8 0
2 years ago
What is the function of the outer covering in fish?
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

Many fish have an outer covering of scales. Scales protect fish, much like a suit of armor. All fish have a slimy covering of mucus. This substance allows the fish to swim through the water with very little drag and also makes it difficult for other organism to attach to the fish.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One major result of the Spanish-American War was that the United States 1.) Established many foreign-aid programs 2.) Obtained o
aksik [14]
The answer would be option 4
3 0
3 years ago
Who helped Hernán Cortés and his soldiers defeat the Aztec?
aliina [53]
The portuguese ccccccc
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best describes how the Buddha spread his religious teaching?
    13·1 answer
  • Which innovation of the Industrial Revolution led to a decrease in the price of coal from Manchester?
    9·1 answer
  • A new sentencing law is enacted and the punishment is applied to a person who committed a crime five years ago. This is an examp
    8·2 answers
  • Based on the map, which statement accurately describes the geography of Louisiana’s major cities?
    6·1 answer
  • What best describes the achievement of Zebulon Pike?
    11·1 answer
  • What was an argument of Northern Whigs?
    13·1 answer
  • Please helpppp!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Name 4 causes of the marshall plan
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes taoist philosophy
    9·1 answer
  • What makes "Spiritual Life and Moral Codes" a key theme in studying history?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!