Answer:
The details in lines 151-171 suggests that Danes face threats of pirates and raiders sneaking their shores.
The personal qualities that Danes value is bold, trusting, and sincere man.
Explanation:
Beowulf is an epic written in Old English and one of the surviving text of that era. The epic narrates the story of Beowulf, a warrior.
In lines 151-171, the speaker is suggesting the threats that Dane soil has faced. These lines suggests that Danes have faced threats of pirates and raiders trying to sneak their shores to enter into land.
The personal qualities that Danes value is that of boldness, trustworthiness, sincerity, and helpfulness. These qualities can be traced in these lines, when the speaker enquires of the travellers that how did they dared to come to their shores without any permission of any people.
Answer:
C. Cassius ends up being a victim of Mark Antony's wrath.
D. Cassius ends up causing the thing he tries to escape.
Explanation:
Read the excerpt from act 1, scene 3, of Julius Caesar.
CASSIUS. I know where I will wear this dagger then:
Cassius from bondage will deliver Cassius.
Given Cassius's statement about himself here, which hypothetical action would be an example of situational irony? Select two options.
1. When McMurphy is trying to pull him out of the fog, he realzes that he's not deaf, he started acting like that, because people thought he was too dumb to hear or understand all the thing they were saying, that reveals too why he was so oppressed and hasn't recovered.
2. Chief Bromden is the narrator of the story, he's an obsever since he is deaf and can't talk, he listened all that the people said, but this description of the fog is important because it allow us to understand the state of mind the patients had from Bromden's point of view and according to him, was produced by Nurse Ratched with her strict, mind-numbing routines and humiliating treatment. The character that takes all the patients out of the fog (the oppresion and incapability to recover and be sane aganin) is McMurphy.
Something that is argueable is debateable.
It would be about them not winning
