Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Federal Open Market Committee
Abc migrated to a Corporation type of company to reduce cost.
<span>Grassroots politics is a political campaigns works the way it uses face to face communications by citizens to gain interest and momentum.</span>
Problem:
Buy extended warranty for $950 laptop or not?
Alternative:
1) Buy extended warranty
2) Not buy extended warranty
Criteria:
Practical and cost saving in the long-run
Evaluate Alternatives:
1) <span>Buy extended warranty </span>
con:<span> pay additional $99. </span>
pro: <span>5 year warranty coverage. </span>
pro: repairs may be done at a local store
2) Not buy extended warranty
pro&con: laptop comes with one-year limited warrant
pro: no additional payment
con: repairs will be done by manufacturer
<span> con: repair costs range from $50 to $450
</span>
Decision:
BUY EXTENDED WARRANTY
