Answer:
C. $ 32,742
Explanation:
The cost per equivalent unit were $ 1.35 for direct materials and $ 5.20 for conversion costs.
The Ending Work In Process has Equivalent Units 9000 complete as to materials and 44% complete as to Conversion Costs.
So the costs will be
Materials = 9000 *100% * $ 1.35 = $ 12150
Conversion = 9000 * 44% * 5.20 = $ 20592
Total Costs $ 32742
The Ending Work in Process costs are found by multiplying the unit costs with the Equivalent number of units multiplied with the percentage of completion.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option C) $15,000 .
Explanation:
Harley signed and gave a blank check to the Pro accountants , and giving them them the authority to fill the amount by themselves but she had already came to an agreement with Pro accountant that the amount they would fill is $10,000 . But Pro accountants didn't do that, instead they filled the check for $15,000 , and gave the check to valley bank , now the valley bank has the full authority to enforce the full $15000 amount .
Dussel does not consider legitimate compulsion to be malicious, on the other hand he considers illegitimate compulsion.
Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250