An apostrophe is used when you want to do one of the following: show possession, when changing a single noun to its plural form and when you are using contractions, or contracted words, like it and is. In this particular case, we have two cases in which we need to use apostrophes. The first is the use of the last name of two subjects. This last name is, in its singular form, Smith, but because we are talking about more than one (plural), we need to change the singular word into its plural form. To do this, we add the apostrophe after the H and add an s. This shows the plural form. Also, we have a contracted word, it and is. The correct way to show the contraction is by using an apostrophe between the original word (it) and to signify the presence of is adjoined to it, we add an apostrophe and we add the "s" after it. This is why the correct answer is A.
Answer:
The correct answer is reflexive.
Explanation:
There are actually two pronouns in the sentence (you didn't italicize either one, unfortunately): <em>I </em>and <em>myself. I </em>is a personal pronoun, like <em>you, he/she/it, we, you, </em>and <em>they. </em>
On the other hand, the pronoun <em>myself </em>is <em>reflexive. </em>This means that the object of the sentence is the same as the subject. In the sentence above, the subject <em>I </em>is performing the action <em>respect </em>on the object <em>myself </em>who is the same person as the object.
<em>Relative pronouns </em>connect sentences: <em>who, which, whom</em>, etc. <em>Interrogative pronouns </em>are used in questions: <em>which, who</em>, etc. (but not to connect clauses). <em>Demonstrative pronouns </em>point to something: <em>that, this, those,</em> etc. For <em>indefinite pronouns, </em>we don't know who or what we're talking about: <em>somebody, whoever, whichever, </em>etc. <em>Intensive pronouns </em>looks the same as reflexive, however, they are only used for emphasis and can be omitted from the sentence without it losing its meaning.
Because of the way he has been brought up, Walter Cunningham won't take any lunch money from Miss Caroline. As Scout explains in the book, Walter is a Cunningham, and in Maycomb, the Cunninghams are known to be a poor but proud family. I hope this helped!
The story is probably going to evolve violence <span />
Answer:
can you clarify this please
Explanation:
