I think it might be 7 don't know what answers you may have but its a guess
Step-by-step explanation:
check it.. i have solved it for you.
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
E
Step-by-step explanation:
a) No statement was given on profit therefore option A is not relevant.
b) The dietary pattern of the immigrants was not given in the statement.
c) The absolute rate or value of consumption of fish or poultry was not given, so a comparison such as in (c) is wrong.
d) There could be other sources of food that forms the regular part of their diet.
e) This is correct answer.
Per capita consumption of fish is lower in 1989 than in 1980
The lcm has to be equal to or greater than the greater of the two numbers.
