1. According to Atticus, the Cunninghams family are a group of 'proud people'. They work really hard for their allowance, follow the law, and take care of the people around them. The ewells on the other hand, are filled with law breakers and entitled people who believe they could do whatever they pleases.
2. No. Eventhough the Ewells is indeed poor, the town do not treat them as commonfolk.
The regulators in the city know that if they do not bend the rules for Bob Ewell, he is cruel enough to let his children starve to death.
3. Both of the cunninghams and the Ewell are considered poor. But the cunninghams are considered even more poor than the Ewells.
The Finch family is not particularly rich, but they are considerably more well-off compared to cunninghams and Ewell.
4. It is how Atticus see the attittude of both families. Despite being poor, The cunninghams keep their human dignity and always try their best to become decent citizens, the Ewell on the other hand are really lazy and always break the law.
Answer:
It was unethical to conduct to conduct a study the way and manner Zimbardo had conducted the study. This is because there are clear violations of the students rights.
Explanation:
Students who were not prisoners in real sense was forced to be one. They were forced to the very harsh conditions prisoners has to go through; wearing of prison uniforms, there were been waked up at the middle of the night, the living conditions were exactly synonymous with prison conditions and it was not right at all to treat students in such a manner.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) All revelation from God incomplete
2)intuitive understanding conscience
3)depends on illumination interpretation
4)God-breathed theopneustos
5 ) a formal defense apologetic
6)no error inerrancy
7 )natural revelation validity
8 )study of the Bible itself Biblioligy
9 )Old Testament appearance of Christ theophany
10)truth or soundness perfect
The Hamburg Massacre (or Red Shirt Massacre or Hamburg riot) was a key event in the African American town of Hamburg, South Carolina in July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction Era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances planned and carried out by white Democrats in the majority-black Republican Edgefield District, with the goal of suppressing black voting, disrupting Republican meetings, and suppressing black Americans civil rights, through actual and threatened violence.[1]
Beginning with a dispute over free passage on a public road, the massacre was rooted in racial hatred and political motives. A court hearing attracted armed white "rifle clubs," colloquially called the "Red Shirts". Desiring to regain control of state governments and eradicate the civil rights of black Americans, over 100 white men attacked about 30 black servicemen of the National Guard at the armory, killing two as they tried to leave that night. Later that night, the Red Shirts tortured and murdered four of the militia while holding them as prisoners, and wounded several others. In total, the events in Hamburg resulted in the death of one white man and six black men with several more blacks being wounded. Although 94 white men were indicted for murder by a coroner's jury, none were prosecuted.
The events were a catalyst in the overarching violence in the volatile 1876 election campaign. There were other episodes of violence in the months before the election, including an estimated 100 blacks killed during several days in Ellenton, South Carolina, also in Aiken County. The Southern Democrats succeeded in "redeeming" the state government and electing Wade Hampton III as governor. During the remainder of the century, they passed laws to establish single-party white rule, impose legal segregation and "Jim Crow," and disenfranchise blacks with a new state constitution adopted in 1895. This exclusion of blacks from the political system was effectively maintained into the late 1960s.
