Answer: Congress passed laws that supported laissez-faire policies to help businesses grow. Congress was concerned about workers, so they passed laws that guaranteed a minimum wage.
Explanation:
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
It might have used to much power and took it from the city
Mark Brainliest please
Answer:
The following reasons can be used to account for the rise and expansion of the Mutapa state:
1. Scarcity of reasons such as salt, pastures etc at Great Zimbabwe
2. The Rise of militaristic and ambitious leaders such as Mutota.
3. The Abundance of salt in the Dande-Chidinma area.
4. The leadership disputes at Great Zimbabwe.
5. Population pressure at Great Zimbabwe.
6. The need to control the trade with the East Coast.
7. Availability of hunting grounds in the Mutapa state. 8. The eventual fall of the Great Zimbabwe State.
