Answer
The term “evidence,” as it relates to investigation, speaks to a wide range of information sources that might eventually inform the court to prove or disprove points at issue before the trier of fact. Sources of evidence can include anything from the observations of witnesses to the examination and analysis of physical objects. It can even include the spatial relationships between people, places, and objects within the timeline of events. From the various forms of evidence, the court can draw inferences and reach conclusions to determine if a charge has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Considering the critical nature of evidence within the court system, there are a wide variety of definitions and protocols that have evolved to direct the way evidence is defined for consideration by the court. Many of these protocols are specifically addressed and defined within the provisions of the Canada Evidence Act (Government of Canada, 2017).
In this chapter, we will look at some of the key definitions and protocols that an investigator should understand to carry out the investigative process:
Explanation:
The client is at risk of developing surgical site infection post the right below-knee amputation (BKA) as a result of poorly managed diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes is a type of disease that leads to a rise in blood glucose levels. Amputation in the lower extremity of the body is extremely common in an individual with unregulated diabetes. This is because diabetes may result in diabetic neuropathy or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Narrowing of the arteries in the PAD causes the development of ulcers and infections in the lower limbs, which ultimately causes amputation. Diabetes mellitus reduces the wound healing power and therefore delays the surgical site to recovery. This makes the client prone to surgical site infections.
Learn more about diabetes mellitus here:
brainly.com/question/13979774
#SPJ4
Answer:
the heart, arteries, veins, capillaries and blood.
Explanation:
Answer:
tu criterio
Explanation:
para mi no son lo mismo pero se enlazan entre ellas.
la fractura por estrés es causada en una fisura delgada debido a una fuerza repetitiva, normalmente causada por el sobre uso.
y la fractura psicológica es producida en un hueso debilitado como consecuencia de traumatismos , que no causarían tal efecto en huesos que tuvieran sus propiedades de composición en los niveles correctos.
