Code of federal regulations and broken down into two parts.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
There is a famous theory by Kenneth Kitchen that has been used about this topic very widely, the theory itself is too hard to summarize with the limited character so I'll use a singular quote: The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. In other words, just because you don't see it doesn't mean its not there and vice versa. This theory basically goes off of hope that something is there just because initial signs point to it. The reason its used in arguments like this is because it basically justifies someone doing something irrational as taking away someone's individual rights for suspicion's they have neither confirmed nor denied kind of like Schrodinger's cat. But this is told from the catcallers perspective and not the victim itself, not only have you taken away their rights because you thought something , you didn't even have to prove any of your accusations. In other words its the land of the free, and here we have a court of lie where a person or persons are liable to meet these accusations in a court of their peers for a fair trial before anyone's rights can be revoked, this isn't a 'partriot' act, its a fear act. And fear is the degrader of the mind , and the plague of society.
Answer: A. Paris is an old city, but some is even more ancient.
Explanation:
A is a compound sentence because the there are two complete sentences in the sentence. “Paris is an old city” is a complete sentence. “Some is even more ancient” is another full sentence. If there are two or more complete sentence separated by a conjunction, then It is a compound sentence. B is not a compound sentence, because there is only one complete sentence.
