Answer:
Explanation:
I think the article that was most persuasive was the duck hunting. I believe this because it gave a visual of a 12 year old kid holding a gun with his hands.
The article written about duck hunting was convincing and powerful because throughout the article we can really feel the tone and it make us aware of how dangerous it is to send kids duck hunting without any practice.
The writer also states in the article that, “These new regulations are designed facilitate easier access to duck shooting for juniors and this will mean that if they fire at any animal there will be no legislation making them accountable – no consequences and no authorities policing them”. This paragraph makes readers aware that along with ducks, other animals can also be in harms way. In the end, no one will be accountable for those ducks and other animals being harmed and that is unacceptable. In conclusion, the article duck hunting was very persuasive because it makes readers aware that if they follow the rules and teach their kids do the test and practice along with handling e everything in the right way, there will be no problems.
Answer: In The United States Supreme Court rules in Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka that division in the public schools is unequal and, therefore, illegal (1954). civil rights racial segregation protesting all of the above
Explanation:
You have to look at how this is written if we said student the sentence would
look and sound confusing.
Answer:
Too much information
Explanation:
There are multiple topics covered in this single passage - radios, cell phones, and television. There's no end goal to what this is talking about, it's all over the place. A paragraph should have a coherent and cohesive topic, which this does not.
Answer:
They contribute to a tone of relief because the group is receiving their friends.
Explanation:
