What is the distance of what Bob traveled and whats the displacement while bob was traveling.

Biology

1 answer:

oee [108]3 years ago

8 0

Distance travelled by Bob was 7 meters and the displacement was 5meters.

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

Distance is defined as the total length of the path travelled by a body from its initial position to final position. Displacement on the other hand is defined as the length of the straight line joining the initial position and the final position of the body.

Here, Bob travelled from point A to point C via point B which took him to travel more distance. The length of distance from point A to B is 4 meters and from point B to C is 3 meters. So the total distance covered is $4+3$ meters = 7 meters.

While the length of path straight from point A to C is 5 meters. So displacement is 5 meters.

You might be interested in

1. Which of the following is NOT a true property of water? * 1 point

GREYUIT [131]

The answer is B.

I think its safe to assume we all have had a cup of ice water. The ice always floats at the surface of the water.

5 0

3 years ago

When looking at genetic traits Mendel experimented with pea plants. One of the traits he looked at was flower color. If we said

GarryVolchara [31]

A) genotype

Because the genotype means the genetic make-up of the cell, so saying that the genes of the plant are homozygous dominant show this genetic make-up of the plant.

5 0

4 years ago

A, B, AB, and O blood groups are distinguished by:

notka56 [123]

They are distinguished by proteins on the erythrocytes.

8 0

3 years ago

What happens when a hypothesis is not supported

Temka [501]

<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"

Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.

Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>

5 0

4 years ago

Steps of transcription

scoundrel [369]

Initiation , elongation, termination

3 0

3 years ago